Virtual communities are social aggregations that emerge from the Net when enough people carry on…public discussions long enough, with sufficient human feeling, to form webs of personal relationships in cyberspace.
-Howard Rheingold
I need to take a moment and focus my efforts here. It is now I need to think and take stock of all that I have attempted to do. I have created a very nice-looking blog, a blog with the following three purposes:
1–to give my students a forum for creating thought-provoking, inspiring pieces of writing for a genuine critical audience.
2–to give my students the opportunity to BE the genuine critical audience in order for them to gain an appreciation for the contributions that many people are making to this world.
3–to create a community bound by a common sense of purpose.
So what have I accomplished? Well, aside from the basic set-up, much of my efforts have been focused on building an audience for my student’s work and attempting to woo other teachers into interacting with us as both audience members and contributors. I really wanted the genuine, public discussion Howard Rheingold referred to as being essential to the development of web of relationships that define online communities. I felt that, if my students felt ties to this online community, they might feel a desire to contribute to it in the form of thought-provoking writing and acts of social responsibility.
Building an audience for yet another blog has not been an easy task. I chronicled many of my attempts to rally an audience in my post “Finding an Audience; Building a Community“. After all of my efforts, is there really any evidence that the community is starting to develop?
The answer is…yes! (thankfully…) Our community is small–a glimmer, perhaps, of what it may become with time–but it is growing beyond our classroom walls. And many of my students are definitely aiding this process voluntarily. How do I know this? Well, for a start, the evidence is within the blog itself.
Comments: Friends, Family and Beyond
What does it show when someone voluntarily leaves a comment or question on a blog post? I have decided to sort the comments left on my class blog by way of author, intended recipient of the comment, and apparent intent. I used Webspiration as my sorting platform and created a set of codes to help me based on line colour, thickness, fill colour and shape of the bubbles. Here is my coding structure:
Figure 1:

I decided to sort and code comments left on the main page of the blog separately from those that were left on student project pages. I hypothesized that they would be quite different, and I was correct, as you will see later.
The Front Page:
The front page of my blog, Hope Future Now, is a page where I feature the writing of one or two student writers per week. To make it to the front page, students needed to have really discovered their voice on a particular issue and have an interesting perspective to offer. I select pieces that I think will generate some discussion. They are not necessarily polished. Errors in basic mechanics are only a problem if they impede communication of their ideas.
Since September, there have been 31 comments left on various posts. I first sorted them based on whether or not the author was a student or an adult and to whom their comment was directed. Based on this sorting, I discovered that the vast majority of comments (29 ) were written by adults. These adults were largely commenting on student writing (26 ). Three of the comments left by adults were addressed specifically to me. Only two students left comments on the front page. These students were not from my class and they were commenting on student writing.
I was most interested in the intent of the comments. I created the following coding for comment intent:
On the front page, the majority of comments left by both adults and students (28), either praised the writing (5) or thoughts/actions of the student (15) or both (8). At the outset of this study, I completely expected these types of comments because, after all, the front page is a showcase of interesting writing about thoughts and actions of students. So why not simply praise? In my mind, however, these types of comments are nice, but not are not powerful evidence of the development of a community of common purpose. To me, the comments needed to extend beyond simple praise and needed to contain evidence that the commenter was moved to share their own ideas about the topics and/or engage in a sort of discourse about them. I developed two separate codes for these types of comment:


In all, I found that 9 of the commenters wrote of their personal interest in the ideas posed by the students. Three of the commenters posed questions or generated comments implying that a response is desired. One of the three was directed at one of my students, and the other two were specifically directed to me.
All of these comments are evidence that a community of common purpose is developing on a couple of different levels. One level is “person to person” where individuals share interests and values (see figure 2 for samples). Another level is “professional to professional” where individuals share ideas and pose questions (see figure 3 for samples).
Figure 2: (sharing of interests and values)
Figure 3: (discourse or response expected)

Phase 2: Student Project Pages
I hypothesized that the comments left on these pages would be quite different than the ones left on the front page for several reasons. The first, and biggest, reason is that these projects are constant “works in progress”. Second, they are written “behind the scenes”. There are 30 student pages, with links to each one in a large group. Finally, the student pages were given code names to make them feel anonymous. In all, not very inviting to the outside user. Therefore, I felt that only “insiders” (those specifically aware of the identity of the writer with a specific interest in finding that page) would be leaving comments.
I coded the comments using the same structure as the front page (see figure 1). Fewer people commented on these pages (22 comments in total). Seven of the comments were left by students. Sixteen were left by adults. All of the comments were directed at the students and their writing/ideas.
As many of posts in the student project area are “works in progress”, it is no surprise that many of the comments had the purpose of providing critical feedback. This stands in contrast with the comments left on the front page, where none of the comments offered critical feedback. It is also no surprise that most of the comments offering feedback were left by me! One of the critical feedback comments was left by a student (see figure 4), which I did find surprising, as I had not instructed the students to leave one another comments in any way. This one comment is evidence that the student is interested in the writing and ideas of others. It is also evidence that the student feels he or she has the ability to affect the writing of others in a positive way. Thus, it is evidence–albeit one small piece–that a community of writers is starting to emerge.
Most of the comments left by adults simply praised the work of the student. I also predicted this. I felt that parents might take a look at their own child’s blog and feel compelled to offer positive commentary, which they did. The remaining “adult generated” comments were left by a single educator who painstakingly read through every student project page and left thoughtful commentary that not only praised student work, but also engaged them in a sharing of ideas and interests (see figure 5). This was a complete surprise, because it simply takes so much time! To me, this is evidence of this educator’s interest in encouraging and engaging my students in real discourse about their ideas. If only more people would invest the thought and time into this type of commentary!
Figure 4:

Figure 5:


But does it even matter? Well, one small comment left voluntarily by one of my students in response to comments that she received certainly seems like evidence that, indeed, it does matter:

This little comment is the first piece of evidence of a student engaging specifically with her audience in response to commentary. It is yet another tantalizing piece of evidence that this blog is becoming a community.
Now for the SURVEYS!
Yes, I did create surveys. Triangulation, right? These always seem so boring to me, but master’s studies always seem to be so full of them! Anyway, turns out they are useful and they are helpful in my quest to discover the signs of an emerging community.
In order to accomplish this, I created two surveys using Sharepoint–one for parents, and one for students. My questions for the students focused on the type of (or absense of ) voluntary work from home, whom they have voluntarily shared their blog with, whom they would like to comment on their blog, and what motivates them. My questions for the parents focused on their voluntary reading and commenting on our class blog. I felt it was important to not require students to work on their blog from home because I really wanted to get a sense for how meaningful this project was for students. If students and parents are compelled to check, work on or comment on the blog from home in a completely voluntary fashion, then it shows that they are engaged by the project and perhaps feel ties to the emerging community.
Student Survey Results:
I was quite surprised to discover that majority of students (26 out of 27 who responded to the survey) have voluntarily shared their blog with individuals outside of the classroom. Twenty three of the students have shared their blogs with parents, seven have shared them with other relatives, and ten have shared their blogs with friends. To me, this is definitely evidence that students are proud enough of their work that they want others to see it, and it is evidence that the blog is reaching others beyond the classroom walls.
I was also quite surprised that students were voluntarily adding writing to their blogs (6), making comments (3), reading the work of others (6), checking for comments (9), and checking the front page (8) from home. There were only 5 students who had not done any work from home. For me, this was completely unexpected. Over the past 3 months, I had no sense at all that the kids were choosing to work on the blog from home! This is definitely evidence that these students are invested in the project and are interested to see if others are reading their work.
Finally, I discovered that the majority of students (25 out of 27) wanted others to comment on their blogs. Twenty-four students desired commentary by parents, friends and relatives. They also desired commentary from other students (22), and adults who show interest in their work (10). Interestingly, only 6 students wanted the teacher (me) to comment. This shows that the wider community really matters. In fact, it specifically shows that more kids want the wider community (which includes friends, relatives, and interested adults and peers) to comment on the work than their teacher! Apparently, it takes a village to educate a child.
Parent Survey Results:
I would like to say that the parents read and made comments in a purely voluntary fashion, but in reality, I pestered them every week. Now, there was no requirement to read and comment on the blogs, but I certainly put a lot of pressure on them. They needed to know that their voice mattered! I don’t apologize for my actions; however, you must consider that the involvement of the parents was not truly voluntary, as it was with the students. I also pestered the parents to respond to my survey. In the end, only 15 parents responded (out of a possible 30). I was not really surprised at the lack of parent participation, as it has been a challenge to get them to comment on the blog every week. Plus, they are likely sick of my pestering and may choose to ignore me as a form of protest!
According to the data, 3 parents check the front page of the blog every time there is new writing posted, 6 occasionally check it, 5 rarely check it and 1 did not check it at all. More parents are interested in checking their own child’s project page (11 out of 15). Most (9 out of 15) have not shared their child’s page with anyone else. This data shows that many of the parents have an interest in their child’s work, but are not necessarily interested in the community of common purpose. However, many parents (11 out of 15) have either left comments or are interested in doing so (but not sure how to go about it). Now, this survey data does not tell the whole story of parent involvement. Many parents have posted comments on the front page (10, to be specific). Interestingly, all of the parent comments submitted were about posts written by other children, not their own. This is evidence that the parents are interested in being a part of a community that supports and engages all children, not just their own.
In conclusion, the student survey showed that the students are engaging in work on a voluntary basis and are interested in comments from an audience wider than that of the classroom teacher. The parent survey, on its own, does not match up with actual participation (in the form of comments) in the blog community. However, it does speak to the need for illuminating the parents on just how much their children feel that parent voices matter!
Final Data: Student Writing
Now, the analysis in this section is going to be much less extensive. Nearly every piece of writing that has been written on the blog has either been commissioned or required by me. Plus, I have given the students their topics in nearly all cases. Without them, most students do not know what to write about!
Thankfully, this is not always the case. Plus lately, this pattern is changing. At the beginning of this project, I commissioned Miranda to write about her work as a volunteer. She did so on her own time. I posted up her writing and she ended up receiving many supportive and engaging comments on her post, Volunteer Spirit. Interestingly, after the success of her first post, Miranda voluntarily wrote another post on the Terry Fox run. I see this as evidence that Miranda was motivated to voluntarily contribute to the blog as a result of the interest that people took in her first piece of writing.
Plus, while reading through my student posts, I came across the following introduction that one of my students had written:
Lets take some time to remember. Do you have family members in your famliy that fought in the war?
Hi to people who are reading this. You all know Remembrance day right? Well that’s what this is about.
To me, this is also evidence that my student felt that he/she was writing for an audience wider than simply that of the classroom teacher.
Finally, my student’s have started participating in a project where, as a class, we are raising funds that will help us purchase small gifts for gift baskets that will be distributed to women and their children in the Tri-Cities who are homeless or nearly homeless. This past week, I invited two guest speakers to discuss the project with my kids. During the discussion, many of my students spontaneously came up with wonderful ideas for how they could individually contribute to the project in an on-going way throughout the school year. The following day, many students asked me if they could write about their ideas on their blogs.
This is the first time that students have not asked me for writing ideas. It is evidence that they understand the purpose of the blog (to chronicle making a difference) and that they are motivated to contribute their ideas. It tells me, very clearly, that students need to have more experiences where they are choosing ways to personally make a difference. When they are connected personally to their ideas, they are more willing to share them. This is, ultimately, what I want for my students. I want to empower them to make a difference in the world and I want them to share their efforts with an interested, supportive community through writing.
I have a lot of work yet to do on this project, but I certainly feel that the work so far has been productive. The data, from comments, to surveys, to student writing, all has been very affirming for me. A couple of weeks ago, I was concerned that there was really no evidence of community after all of my efforts trying to rally one. I was quite convinced that I had chosen the wrong project for this type of study. However, now that I have had a chance to really look at all of my data, I really feel a renewed sense of hope that a community really is starting to develop, even if it is still just a glimmer. I believe that I focused too much of my effort in looking outside of my classroom for a community members and a critical audience. I really need to encourage my students to read and comment on the work of their peers. Of course, the reading needs to be interesting and the ideas, as I stated before, need to come from individual students, not from me. If the rest of the world would like to contribute as well, all the better! We are just not going to sit around and wait for them.


There is something incredible that happens when you know for sure that some voluntary stranger is moved to comment on something that you have written. I know this first hand. I was so thrilled when I received my first comments on this blog. I had put a lot of thought and effort into my first few articles. I read, found relevant supporting research and quotes, and composed some of my most insightful writing on a topic for which I have great passion. It consumed a great deal of my off-time. I have never voluntarily put that much effort into writing before in my life. Why? Because I knew people were reading my work. I didn’t even know them. They left me wonderful, validating comments.











Recent Comments